#26 Josh Phegley |
First impression of
what’s going on: Here’s a guy I have never heard of outside of baseball
cards. Granted I’m not a big American League guy but I've seen a few White Sox
games on WGN when the Cubs aren't on. Phegley’s rookie card is in last year’s Update series.
On this card, he could be launching a bomb or merely flying
out, but either way, his eye line looks like it’s headed towards the outfield.
CHICAGO, IL - AUGUST 26: Josh Phegley #36 of the Chicago White Sox bats against the Houston Astros at U.S. Cellular Field on August 26, 2013 in Chicago, Illinois. The Astros defeated the White Sox 10-8. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)
The Reality of the
Photo: Cropping bats is ok with me, but it’s a little tight at Phegley’s
elbow. The caption didn't give much detail about the at bat but let’s see if we
can narrow it down with a little help from the BOXSCORE.
We knew the White Sox lost from the caption, but maybe
Phegley had a good game?
Pretty good actually. Two hits, two runs, an RBI. Let’s see
if we can pin down the photo.
A single to center in the third. That’s a possibility. And
he came around to score. What else?
A groundout to shortstop in the fifth. Probably not.
An RBI single to center in the 5-run sixth that led to
Phegley scoring another run too.
And finally a flyball to left field. If this was left
center, I’d call it a maybe, but his eye line doesn’t say “left field line” to
me. So the photo probably comes from one of those two singles from earlier.
Phegley was also involved in what seems to be an interesting
double play in that game too, although its hard to tell from just a boxscore interpretation.
It looks like a squeeze play gone wrong for the Astros. With
a runner at third and one out, Phegley fields the ball (bunt attempt?), throws
to first for the second out. The first baseman, Paul Konerko, then fires home
to the pitcher, Andre Rienzo for the third out for the uncommon, 2-3-1 double
play.
*EDIT*
After a little search, I found the play on MLB.com. I can't figure out how to embed it but here's the link:
So it wasn't a sacrifice attempt, just a weak hit.
Unfortunately for Phegley, there isn’t much to latch onto
with this card. No real niches. There’s a partial Astros cameo in the
background, but the photo is too blurry to make out who the player is.
On to the back:
Rookie Fact: Josh threw out 13 runners and picked off two in
64 defensive games.
I couldn’t figure out if Topps was underselling Phegley
behind the plate or overselling him so I decided to do a little research
myself. How many innings was he behind the plate in these defensive games? Was
he a pinch hitter who stayed in for one defensive inning with no runners? Did
the White Sox pitchers give up tons of singles and walks last year?
I was actually a little surprised by these numbers. Of his
64 defensive appearances, 47 of them were complete games. That seems like a lot
for a backup, but what do I know?
Phegley’s 13 thrown out base runners was good for 30% of the
attempts. That seems like a pretty high, or at least decent, percentage to me.
Nearly one in three. But again, I’m no expert on the catcher position, so what
do I know.
This blurb actually gave a fact and followed up with the
others who have done it so I didn’t have to do the research myself. Yay!
Information I’ll be tracking:
Card Number: #26
Player Name: Josh
Phegley
Team: Chicago
White Sox
Position: Catcher
Game Date: August
26, 2013
Opponent: Houston
Astros
Stadium: US Cellular
Field
Division: American
League Central
Home/Away: Home
Outcome of the game:
10-8, Astros over the White Sox, Loss for the player depicted
Alternate/Throwback
Jersey: No.
Bats/Throws: Right/Right
Birthdate: 2/12/1988
Birthplace: Indiana
Cameos by: Unknown
(Astros)
Photographer: Jonathan
Daniel
Niche collections
this card could fit into: Former 1st Round Draft Pick,
My Grade: This
card isn’t bad. There isn’t much wrong with it at all, just some slight
mis-cropping. But there isn’t much great about it either. It is the definition
of average. Other than him being a younger player and no options, I don’t know
why card manufacturers wouldn’t always showcase a catcher in their gear and/or
a play at the plate. And I’m not even a catcher guy.
This card gets a C.
Although not a failing grade, here are some photos from
earlier in the season than this one that could have been used to improve it.
A play at the plate where a Cub is safe? Yes! |
A double high five with cameos? |
Throwbacks? |
Broken Bat? |
Celebrations and throwbacks? And a potential horizontal layout ? Ding! Ding! Ding! |
Whoops, too many more and Topps might start to feel bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment